Mensinger v. Standard Accident Insurance
This text of 202 Ga. 258 (Mensinger v. Standard Accident Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The purpose of' the Declaratory Judgment Act of 1945 (Ga. L. 1945, p. 137), as declared in section 13 thereof, is to settle and afford relief from uncertainty and insecurity with respect to rights, status, and other legal relations, and is to he liberally [259]*259construed, and administered. Clein v. Kaplan, 201 Ga. 396 (40 S. E. 2d, 133).
2. The allegations of the petition showed an actual controversy between the petitioner, the insurance company, and the defendants, and presented a case for a declaratory judgment as to the rights of the parties, and, accordingly, the court did not err in overruling the ground of general demurrer that no cause of action was set forth.
3. The petition was not subject to the ground of demurrer that it showed that the petitioner had an adequate and complete remedy at law.
4. The petition was not subject to the special demurrer on the ground of misjoinder of parties defendant, since it was alleged that all of the defendants contend that the liability-insurance policy issued by the petitioner to one of the defendants, against whom tort actions had been brought by the other defendants, was valid • and obligated the insurance company to defend, on behalf of the policyholder, such suits and pay any judgment that might be rendered therein, the insurance company contending to the contrary.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
202 Ga. 258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mensinger-v-standard-accident-insurance-ga-1947.