Mense v. Eckelkamp

Missouri Court of Appeals

Mense v. Eckelkamp

934 S.W.2d 20, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1859, 1996 WL 653807

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 12, 1996

DocketNo. 69083

StatusPublished

This text of 934 S.W.2d 20 (Mense v. Eckelkamp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mense v. Eckelkamp, 934 S.W.2d 20, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1859, 1996 WL 653807 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM DECISION

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Gene Eckelkamp appeals the trial court’s judgment in a court-tried case awarding damages to plaintiff. Defendant on appeal challenges only the trial court’s denial of his oral motion for continuance made at the time of trial. Ecklekamp appeared pro se when the court granted his trial counsel’s motion for withdrawal one week prior to this scheduled trial. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the continuance. Lamastus v. Lamastus, 886 S.W.2d 721 (Mo.App.1994).

An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a statement supporting this decision.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI