Menough's Appeal

5 Watts & Serg. 432
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMay 15, 1843
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 5 Watts & Serg. 432 (Menough's Appeal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Menough's Appeal, 5 Watts & Serg. 432 (Pa. 1843).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Sergeant, J.

This is a contest for the year’s rent between the purchaser of the land at sheriff’s sale, and the .assignee of the debtor. After judgment obtained against the debtor, he made a lease for a year at a rent of $575. No time being stipulated for the payment of rent, it was by law payable at the end of one year, and not before, rent being in its nature a reditus or return for the enjoyment of the annual profits of the land. The purchaser’s title under such judgment is paramount to the lease, and it is at his option, by the 119th section of the Act of 16th of June 1836, to disaffirm the lease, or to affirm it, and avail himself of the legal rights and remedies of the former owner to recover the rent. The assignment of the current rent before it was due, by the former owner, might have been binding on him, had his title to the land continued; but it is invalid as against the purchaser under a previous judgment against him. He is substituted (if he pleases) as . landlord. The accruing rent runs with the land, and cannot be separated from it by the act of the debtor, before it is due, as against the purchaser under the judgment. The right to the current rent is a mere contingency, made indefeasibly subject to the will of the subsequent purchaser at sheriff’s sale, by the Act of 1836. The Act prohibits the payment of the rent in advance, where such has not been the express stipulation; and the right to sell and assign the rent in advance, would produce the same effect as payment of it in advance. The decree of the court below is, therefore, to be affirmed.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

R. Whitson Carter, Ltd. v. Mored, Inc.
12 Pa. D. & C.3d 569 (Berks County Court of Common Pleas, 1979)
Bernard v. Triangle Music Co.
95 P.2d 43 (Washington Supreme Court, 1939)
King v. Bosserman
13 Pa. Super. 480 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1900)
2 Assistance Building & Loan Ass'n v. Wampole
6 Pa. Super. 238 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1897)
Smith v. Crosland
106 Pa. 413 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1884)
Tignor v. Bradley
32 Ark. 781 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1878)
Evans v. Hamrick & Cole
61 Pa. 19 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1869)
Hayden v. Patterson
51 Pa. 261 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1866)
Holtsman v. Loudensleyer
1 Pears. 241 (Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas, 1863)
Ridgley v. Stillwell
27 Mo. 128 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1858)
Bittinger v. Baker
29 Pa. 66 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1857)
Marsh v. Butterworth
4 Mich. 575 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1857)
Boyd v. McCombs
4 Pa. 146 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1846)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 Watts & Serg. 432, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/menoughs-appeal-pa-1843.