Mennonna v. Pennsylvania Railroad
142 A. 922, 6 N.J. Misc. 712, 1928 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 132
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mennonna v. Pennsylvania Railroad. Read the opinion of the Court — 5 N.J. Misc. 233 →
Opinion
This is defendant’s rule for a new trial, and the reasons urged for making the rule absolute are that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence and that the damages are excessive.
We have carefully examined the proofs on both points, and reach the conclusion that neither contention is well founded.
The rule is therefore discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mennonna v. Pennsylvania Railroad, 142 A. 922, 6 N.J. Misc. 712, 1928 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 132 (N.J. 1928).
142 A. 922 (Mennonna v. Pennsylvania Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.