MENKOVIC v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

MENKOVIC v. State

282 S.W.3d 886, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 584, 2009 WL 1289180

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 12, 2009

DocketED 91917

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 282 S.W.3d 886 (MENKOVIC v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

MENKOVIC v. State, 282 S.W.3d 886, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 584, 2009 WL 1289180 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Amir Menkovic appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Amir Menkovic appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

282 S.W.3d 886, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 584, 2009 WL 1289180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/menkovic-v-state-moctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack