MENKOVIC v. State
282 S.W.3d 886, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 584, 2009 WL 1289180
Opinion
ORDER
Amir Menkovic appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
MENKOVIC v. State, 282 S.W.3d 886, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 584, 2009 WL 1289180 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).
282 S.W.3d 886 (MENKOVIC v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Moore v. State
282 S.W.3d 886 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)