Menjivar-Menjivar v. Holder
This text of 328 F. App'x 403 (Menjivar-Menjivar v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Dennis Smith Menjivar-Menjivar, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, Singh v. Ashcroft, 351 F.3d 435, 438 n. 2 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny the petition for review.
Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s conclusion that Menjivar-Menjivar failed to establish that it is more likely than not he would be tortured in Honduras. See id. at 443. Accordingly, his application for deferral of removal under CAT fails.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
328 F. App'x 403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/menjivar-menjivar-v-holder-ca9-2009.