Mengore v. State

718 So. 2d 368, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 12320, 1998 WL 670437
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 1, 1998·No. No. 98-2934·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Michael David Mengore appeals a trial court order denying his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. His motion was properly verified, but the factual allegations in his memorandum of law contained a defective verification clause in which he said that the statements were “true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.” See Scott v. State, 464 So.2d 1171 (Fla.1985); Hahn v. Frederick, 66 So.2d 823 (Fla.1953).

Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s denial of post-conviction relief. This disposition is without prejudice to appellant’s right to timely resubmit the motion and memorandum with a proper oath.

GUNTHER, POLEN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mengore v. State, 718 So. 2d 368, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 12320, 1998 WL 670437 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

718 So. 2d 368 (Mengore v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Greenwood v. State
802 So. 2d 401 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)