Mengelkoch v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Mengelkoch v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.

201 N.W. 610, 161 Minn. 331, 1924 Minn. LEXIS 547

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedDecember 26, 1924

DocketNo. 24,290.

StatusPublished

This text of 201 N.W. 610 (Mengelkoch v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mengelkoch v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co., 201 N.W. 610, 161 Minn. 331, 1924 Minn. LEXIS 547 (Mich. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

After a verdict for plaintiff there was a motion by defendant for a new trial or judgment notwithstanding, from the denial of which this appeal is taken. It is another case wherein damages are sought by the owner of a motor truck caused by a collision between it and a street car at a street intersection. No purpose would be served by stating the facts or discussing the law applicable thereto. The *332 issue of defendant’s negligence was clearly for the jury, as was also that of the plaintiff’s contributory negligence under the rules stated in Bradley v. Minneapolis St. Ry. Co. supra, page 322.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

After a verdict for plaintiff there was a motion by defendant for a new trial or judgment notwithstanding, from the denial of which this appeal is taken. It is another case wherein damages are sought by the owner of a motor truck caused by a collision between it and a street car at a street intersection. No purpose would be served by stating the facts or discussing the law applicable thereto. The *332 issue of defendant’s negligence was clearly for the jury, as was also that of the plaintiff’s contributory negligence under the rules stated in Bradley v. Minneapolis St. Ry. Co. supra, page 322.

Order affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

201 N.W. 610, 161 Minn. 331, 1924 Minn. LEXIS 547, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mengelkoch-v-minneapolis-street-railway-co-minn-1924.