Mengel Co. v. Pierson

132 A. 78, 99 N.J. Eq. 436, 14 Stock. 436, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 537

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 1, 1926·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

*441 Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Eielder.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisoh, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, Mc-Glennon, Kays, Hbteield, JJ. 11.

For reversal — Katzenbach, White, Van Buskirk, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mengel Co. v. Pierson, 132 A. 78, 99 N.J. Eq. 436, 14 Stock. 436, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 537 (N.J. 1926).

Pincite

132 A. 78 (Mengel Co. v. Pierson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.