Mengel Co. v. Pierson

132 A. 78, 99 N.J. Eq. 436, 14 Stock. 436, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 537
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedFebruary 1, 1926
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 132 A. 78 (Mengel Co. v. Pierson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mengel Co. v. Pierson, 132 A. 78, 99 N.J. Eq. 436, 14 Stock. 436, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 537 (N.J. 1926).

Opinion

*441 Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Eielder.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisoh, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, Mc-Glennon, Kays, Hbteield, JJ. 11.

For reversal — Katzenbach, White, Van Buskirk, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re the Unauthorized Practice of Law of Ellis
487 P.2d 286 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1971)
Beall v. Pacific Nat. Bank of Seattle
347 P.2d 550 (Washington Supreme Court, 1959)
Schill v. Schill
138 A. 530 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
132 A. 78, 99 N.J. Eq. 436, 14 Stock. 436, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 537, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mengel-co-v-pierson-nj-1926.