Menge & Sons v. Gulf & Ship Island Railroad
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
Appellee, having voluntarily paid for the coil of rope with full knowledge that it was not of the diameter purchased, if the fact be, as claimed by appellee, that it was not of such diameter, and- after having been advised by appellant -that it would not agree to return of same, cannot now set-off the amount paid appellant for this rope against the amount due appellant for the purchase of other articles. Anderson v. Western Union Tel. Co., 77 Miss. 851, 27 South. 838. The peremptory instruction requested by appellant ought, therefore, to have been given.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
53 So. 424 (Menge & Sons v. Gulf & Ship Island Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.