Meng v. Meng

110 A.2d 225, 380 Pa. 110, 1955 Pa. LEXIS 537
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 6, 1955·No. Appeal, 216·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The order of the Court below refusing to dissolve the preliminary injunction and permitting the appellee to file a bond nunc pro tunc, being interlocutory only and therefore not appealable, the appeal is quashed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Meng v. Meng, 110 A.2d 225, 380 Pa. 110, 1955 Pa. LEXIS 537 (Pa. 1955).

110 A.2d 225 (Meng v. Meng) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Altemose Construction Co. v. Building & Construction Trades Council
337 A.2d 277 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1975)