Meng v. . Meng

119 N.E. 1059, 222 N.Y. 673, 1918 N.Y. LEXIS 1562
New York Court of Appeals·Decided February 5, 1918·Published

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chase, Hogan, Pound and McLaughlin, JJ. Dissenting: Hiscock, Ch. J., Cardozo and Andrews, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Meng v. . Meng, 119 N.E. 1059, 222 N.Y. 673, 1918 N.Y. LEXIS 1562 (N.Y. 1918).

119 N.E. 1059 (Meng v. . Meng) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.