Meng v. Emigrant Industrial Savings Bank
170 A.D. 969
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Meng v. Emigrant Industrial Savings Bank. Read the opinion of the Court — 169 A.D. 27 →
Opinion
Motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Scott and Dowling, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Meng v. Emigrant Industrial Savings Bank, 170 A.D. 969 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).
170 A.D. 969 (Meng v. Emigrant Industrial Savings Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.