Menez v. McDaniel

801 S.W.2d 738, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 1823, 1990 WL 205260
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 18, 1990·No. No. 58299·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the order of the trial court denying plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and granting summary judgment in favor of the individual defendant and dismissing the Personnel Advisory Board as a party. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976). The order of the administrative agency is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record.

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Menez v. McDaniel, 801 S.W.2d 738, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 1823, 1990 WL 205260 (Mo. Ct. App. 1990).

801 S.W.2d 738 (Menez v. McDaniel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Murphy v. Carron
536 S.W.2d 30 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1976)