Menendez v. Saffold Bros. Produce Co., Inc.

163 So. 573, 121 Fla. 296, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1566
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedOctober 22, 1935
StatusPublished

This text of 163 So. 573 (Menendez v. Saffold Bros. Produce Co., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Menendez v. Saffold Bros. Produce Co., Inc., 163 So. 573, 121 Fla. 296, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1566 (Fla. 1935).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries received in a collision between an auto truck and a motorcycle, the court rendered judgment on a directed verdict for the defendant at the close of plaintiff’s testimony and later denied a motion for new trial. Plaintiff took writ of error.

The testimony adduced for the plaintiff clearly showed substantial contributory negligence of the plaintiff who was *297 riding the motorcycle when the collision occurred. This bars recovery by'the common law applicable in such cases. Affirmed.

Whitfield, C. J., and Terrell, Brown, Buford, and Davis, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
163 So. 573, 121 Fla. 296, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1566, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/menendez-v-saffold-bros-produce-co-inc-fla-1935.