Menendez v. McNab

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Menendez v. McNab

83 A.D.2d 893, 442 N.Y.S.2d 121, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15304

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 27, 1981

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 83 A.D.2d 893 (Menendez v. McNab) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Menendez v. McNab, 83 A.D.2d 893, 442 N.Y.S.2d 121, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15304 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding to invalidate petitions designating the respondents-respondents as candidates in the Conservative Party Primary Election to be held on September 10,1981 for the public offices of Town Supervisor, Councilman et al., for the Town of Riverhead, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk [894]*894County (Gerard, J.), dated August 20, 1981, which dismissed the proceeding. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Petitioners-appellants lack standing to challenge the petitions of the respondent candidates since petitioners are not members of the Conservative Party and therefore do not qualify as “aggrieved candidates” pursuant to section 16-102 of the Election Law (see Matter of Wydler v Cristenfeld, 35 NY2d 719). In any event, we have reviewed petitioners’ other contentions and find them to be without merit. Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding to invalidate petitions designating the respondents-respondents as candidates in the Conservative Party Primary Election to be held on September 10,1981 for the public offices of Town Supervisor, Councilman et al., for the Town of Riverhead, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk [894]*894County (Gerard, J.), dated August 20, 1981, which dismissed the proceeding. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Petitioners-appellants lack standing to challenge the petitions of the respondent candidates since petitioners are not members of the Conservative Party and therefore do not qualify as “aggrieved candidates” pursuant to section 16-102 of the Election Law (see Matter of Wydler v Cristenfeld, 35 NY2d 719). In any event, we have reviewed petitioners’ other contentions and find them to be without merit. Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

83 A.D.2d 893, 442 N.Y.S.2d 121, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/menendez-v-mcnab-nyappdiv-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack