Menefee v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Menefee v. State

594 So. 2d 251, 1992 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 50, 1992 WL 37423

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

DecidedJanuary 31, 1992

DocketCR 91-200

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 594 So. 2d 251 (Menefee v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Menefee v. State, 594 So. 2d 251, 1992 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 50, 1992 WL 37423 (Ala. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

BOWEN, Judge.

This is an appeal from the denial of a petition for post-conviction relief. The petitioner challenges his 1990 guilty plea conviction for the unlawful possession of cocaine. The circuit court dismissed the petition on the grounds that “the petition is not sufficiently specific and does not state grounds which would authorize relief. No purpose would be served by further pro-ceedings_” R. 18.

I.

The petitioner’s first two allegations are without merit. Counsel was not ineffective in failing to challenge the indictment because the indictment tracks the language of § 13A-12-211 in alleging the “unlawful” distribution of cocaine and is not fatally defective because it did not allege that the offense was “knowingly” committed. Ex parte Harper, 594 So.2d 1181 (Ala.1991). The allegation that the indictment omitted an element of the offense is without merit, Harper, supra, and does not constitute “newly discovered evidence.”

II.

The petitioner alleges that his attorney failed to file a notice of appeal as requested. This allegation is “meritorious on its face.” Moore v. State, 502 So.2d 819, 820 (Ala.1986). “Where a defendant informs his court-appointed counsel of his desire to appeal, but, through no fault of his own, an appeal is never taken, the defendant is entitled to an appeal of his conviction. Longmire v. State, 443 So.2d 1265, 1269 (Ala.1982).” Hall v. State, 515 So.2d 134, 135 (Ala.Cr.App.1987). The merits of this allegation were not addressed by the district attorney in his motion for summary dismissal. Consequently, those allegations must be accepted as true. Ex parte Floyd, 457 So.2d 961, 962 (Ala.1984).

Therefore, the judgment of the circuit court dismissing the petition for post-conviction relief is reversed. This cause is remanded for an evidentiary hearing or such other proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

All Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BOWEN, Judge.

This is an appeal from the denial of a petition for post-conviction relief. The petitioner challenges his 1990 guilty plea conviction for the unlawful possession of cocaine. The circuit court dismissed the petition on the grounds that “the petition is not sufficiently specific and does not state grounds which would authorize relief. No purpose would be served by further pro-ceedings_” R. 18.

I.

The petitioner’s first two allegations are without merit. Counsel was not ineffective in failing to challenge the indictment because the indictment tracks the language of § 13A-12-211 in alleging the “unlawful” distribution of cocaine and is not fatally defective because it did not allege that the offense was “knowingly” committed. Ex parte Harper, 594 So.2d 1181 (Ala.1991). The allegation that the indictment omitted an element of the offense is without merit, Harper, supra, and does not constitute “newly discovered evidence.”

II.

The petitioner alleges that his attorney failed to file a notice of appeal as requested. This allegation is “meritorious on its face.” Moore v. State, 502 So.2d 819, 820 (Ala.1986). “Where a defendant informs his court-appointed counsel of his desire to appeal, but, through no fault of his own, an appeal is never taken, the defendant is entitled to an appeal of his conviction. Longmire v. State, 443 So.2d 1265, 1269 (Ala.1982).” Hall v. State, 515 So.2d 134, 135 (Ala.Cr.App.1987). The merits of this allegation were not addressed by the district attorney in his motion for summary dismissal. Consequently, those allegations must be accepted as true. Ex parte Floyd, 457 So.2d 961, 962 (Ala.1984).

Therefore, the judgment of the circuit court dismissing the petition for post-conviction relief is reversed. This cause is remanded for an evidentiary hearing or such other proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

All Judges concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

594 So. 2d 251, 1992 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 50, 1992 WL 37423, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/menefee-v-state-alacrimapp-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack