Menefee v. Frost

S.D. New York

Menefee v. Frost

123 F. 633, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4930

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York

DecidedMay 23, 1903

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 123 F. 633 (Menefee v. Frost) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Menefee v. Frost, 123 F. 633, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4930 (S.D.N.Y. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

DACOMBF,, Circuit Judge.

No federal question is involved, and jurisdiction can be entertained only by reason of diversity of citizenship. The complainants are citizens of Texas and Illinois. The three defendants are citizens of New York. It appears, however, that one of the defendants, Wilkinson, should be a party plaintiff, and is named as a defendant solely for the reason that he refuses to join in the bill. The suit is for an accounting upon a written contract in which the three plaintiffs and Wilkinson appear as parties of the first part, and the other two defendants as parties of the second part. The motion must be disposed of, therefore, as if the parties were rearranged as complainants and defendants in conformity to their respective interests in the controversy. When this is done, there will be found a citizen of New York on both sides of the controversy, and, on well-settled principles, this court has no jurisdiction.

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DACOMBF,, Circuit Judge.

No federal question is involved, and jurisdiction can be entertained only by reason of diversity of citizenship. The complainants are citizens of Texas and Illinois. The three defendants are citizens of New York. It appears, however, that one of the defendants, Wilkinson, should be a party plaintiff, and is named as a defendant solely for the reason that he refuses to join in the bill. The suit is for an accounting upon a written contract in which the three plaintiffs and Wilkinson appear as parties of the first part, and the other two defendants as parties of the second part. The motion must be disposed of, therefore, as if the parties were rearranged as complainants and defendants in conformity to their respective interests in the controversy. When this is done, there will be found a citizen of New York on both sides of the controversy, and, on well-settled principles, this court has no jurisdiction.

Motion granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

123 F. 633, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4930, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/menefee-v-frost-nysd-1903.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack