Mene v. Marriott International, Inc.

208 F. App'x 839
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided November 2, 2006·No. No. 2007-1013·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of this recently docketed appeal, the court considers whether this appeal should be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

This is an appeal in an ERISA action to recover payment of benefits allegedly due under the terms of a long-term disability plan. This court’s jurisdiction does not extend to such matters. 28 U.S.C. § 1295.

Moreover, the appeal is untimely and, thus, transfer is not warranted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631. The certified list of docket entries of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia reflects that the order denying appellant’s motion for reconsideration of the judgment was entered on June 16, 2006. The list further reflects that the appellant filed the notice of appeal to this court on September 28, 2006, more than 30 days after the order was entered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mene v. Marriott International, Inc., 208 F. App'x 839 (Fed. Cir. 2006).

208 F. App'x 839 (Mene v. Marriott International, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related