Mendoza Vs. Eglet Prince

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided January 17, 2020·No. 78484·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

ERIC MENDOZA AND MICHELLE No. 78484 MENDOZA, PARENTS AND GUARDIANS OF CHARLES MENDOZA, A MINOR; ERIC MENDOZA, INDIVIDUALLY; AND MICHELLE MENDOZA,

FILED

INDIVIDUALLY, JAN 1 7 thal Appellants, A. BROWN EH

PREMF COURT

vs. CLE BY

EGLET PRINCE; AND THE GALLIHER DEPU1Y CLERK

LAW FIRM,

Res • ondents.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and cause appearing, this appeal is dismissed. The parties shall bear their own costs and attorney fees. NRAP 42 (b) .

It is so ORDERED.

CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT ELIZABETH A. BRO

BY:

cc: Hon. James Crockett, District Judge Kristine M. Kuzemka, Settlement Judge Ireland Law Group, LLC The Law Offices of Laura Hunt, PC Prince Law Group The Galliher Law Firm Eglet Adams Eighth District Court Clerk SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

CLERK'S ORDER

(0) 1947 .49, ao.-

• T, q• •1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mendoza Vs. Eglet Prince, (Neb. 2020).

Mendoza Vs. Eglet Prince (Mendoza Vs. Eglet Prince) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.