Mendoza Vs. Eglet Prince
This text of Mendoza Vs. Eglet Prince (Mendoza Vs. Eglet Prince) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
ERIC MENDOZA AND MICHELLE No. 78484 MENDOZA, PARENTS AND GUARDIANS OF CHARLES MENDOZA, A MINOR; ERIC MENDOZA, INDIVIDUALLY; AND MICHELLE MENDOZA, FILED INDIVIDUALLY, JAN 1 7 thal Appellants, A. BROWN EH PREMF COURT vs. CLE BY EGLET PRINCE; AND THE GALLIHER DEPU1Y CLERK
LAW FIRM, Res • ondents.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and cause appearing, this appeal is dismissed. The parties shall bear their own costs and attorney fees. NRAP 42 (b) . It is so ORDERED.
CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT ELIZABETH A. BRO
BY:
cc: Hon. James Crockett, District Judge Kristine M. Kuzemka, Settlement Judge Ireland Law Group, LLC The Law Offices of Laura Hunt, PC Prince Law Group The Galliher Law Firm Eglet Adams Eighth District Court Clerk SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
CLERK'S ORDER
(0) 1947 .49, ao.- • T, q• •1
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Mendoza Vs. Eglet Prince, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mendoza-vs-eglet-prince-nev-2020.