Mendoza-Vasquez v. Gonzales

211 F. App'x 615

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Footnotes

•

**

Randolph Mendoza-Vasquez, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for re view of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) opinion which summarily affirmed the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252.

Mendoza-Vasquez contends that the IJ erred by failing to find that he was eligible for withholding because he showed a clear probability of persecution on the basis of political opinion. Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s conclusion that Mendoza-Vasquez was not eligible for withholding because the incidents involving the narco traffickers were not based on an enumerated ground. See Al-Harbi v. INS, 242 F.3d 882, 888 (9th Cir.2001); INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 n. 1, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992).

Mendoza-Vasquez failed to establish a CAT claim because he did not show that it is more likely than not that he will be tortured if he returned to Guatemala. See Malhi v. INS, 336 F.3d 989, 993 (9th Cir.2003).

Finally, we reject Mendoza-Vasquez’s contention that the BIA erred by summarily affirming the IJ’s decision. See Jiang v. Gonzales, 425 F.3d 649, 654 (9th Cir.2005).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.