Mendoza v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Mendoza v. State

270 S.W. 1118, 99 Tex. Crim. 546, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 248

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided April 1, 1925·No. No. 9330.·Published

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is robbery; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of five years.

The record is before us without bills of exception or statement of facts. The indictment is regular, and the charge of the court sufficiently presents the law. There is nothing presented to this court for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is robbery; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of five years.

The record is before us without bills of exception or statement of facts. The indictment is regular, and the charge of the court sufficiently presents the law. There is nothing presented to this court for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Mendoza v. State, 270 S.W. 1118, 99 Tex. Crim. 546, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 248 (Tex. 1925).

Pincite

270 S.W. 1118 (Mendoza v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.