Mendoza v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Mendoza v. State

270 S.W. 1118, 99 Tex. Crim. 546, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 248

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedApril 1, 1925

DocketNo. 9330.

StatusPublished

This text of 270 S.W. 1118 (Mendoza v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mendoza v. State, 270 S.W. 1118, 99 Tex. Crim. 546, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 248 (Tex. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is robbery; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of five years.

The record is before us without bills of exception or statement of facts. The indictment is regular, and the charge of the court sufficiently presents the law. There is nothing presented to this court for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is robbery; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of five years.

The record is before us without bills of exception or statement of facts. The indictment is regular, and the charge of the court sufficiently presents the law. There is nothing presented to this court for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

270 S.W. 1118, 99 Tex. Crim. 546, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mendoza-v-state-texcrimapp-1925.