Mendoza v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Mendoza v. State

172 S.W. 790, 1915 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 482

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided January 13, 1915·No. No. 3383·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

DAVIDSON, J.

This record is in the same condition as that in the recent case of Leonardo L. Vasquez v. State, 172 S. W. 225, except in this record there are no bills of exception. The case is before us without a statement of facts. The questions presented in the different motions in the record were disposed of adversely to appellant in the Vasquez Case, supra. The judgment and sentence both failed to place the punishment within the indeterminate sentence law.

The judgment and sentence will be reformed, so as to conform to the indeterminate sentence law, and the judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAVIDSON, J.

This record is in the same condition as that in the recent case of Leonardo L. Vasquez v. State, 172 S. W. 225, except in this record there are no bills of exception. The case is before us without a statement of facts. The questions presented in the different motions in the record were disposed of adversely to appellant in the Vasquez Case, supra. The judgment and sentence both failed to place the punishment within the indeterminate sentence law.

The judgment and sentence will be reformed, so as to conform to the indeterminate sentence law, and the judgment affirmed.

Mendoza v. State, 172 S.W. 790, 1915 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 482 (Tex. 1915).

Pincite

172 S.W. 790 (Mendoza v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related