Mendoza v. State

252 So. 3d 412
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 24, 2018
DocketCase No. 2D17-2761
StatusPublished

This text of 252 So. 3d 412 (Mendoza v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mendoza v. State, 252 So. 3d 412 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

BLACK, Judge.

*413Brianna Mendoza seeks correction of the order finding her in violation of her probation. She does not challenge the finding that she violated probation or the resulting sentence, and we affirm both without comment. But because the revocation order should reflect the oral pronouncement, we remand for the trial court to strike the revocation order and enter a corrected revocation order reflecting two condition 5 violations and conforming to the oral pronouncement in all other respects. See Reed v. State, 127 So.3d 817, 819 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013).

Affirmed; remanded with instructions.

LaROSE, C.J. and SALARIO, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reed v. State
127 So. 3d 817 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
252 So. 3d 412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mendoza-v-state-fladistctapp-2018.