Mendoza v. State

616 So. 2d 589, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4408, 1993 WL 100339
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 6, 1993
DocketNo. 93-508
StatusPublished

This text of 616 So. 2d 589 (Mendoza v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mendoza v. State, 616 So. 2d 589, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4408, 1993 WL 100339 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, William Mendoza, appeals the summary denial of his Rule 3.850 motion for post conviction relief. We affirm.

Appellant filed a motion for post-conviction relief contending that his guilty plea was involuntarily entered. The trial court summarily denied the motion because the [590]*590grounds raised were either legally insufficient or refuted by the record. We agree that appellant’s claim is conclusively refuted by the record and plea colloquy attached to appellant’s motion. Agan v. State, 503 So.2d 1254 (Fla.1987). We affirm the denial of Mendoza’s motion for post-conviction relief.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Agan v. State
503 So. 2d 1254 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
616 So. 2d 589, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4408, 1993 WL 100339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mendoza-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.