Mendoza v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Mendoza v. State

616 So. 2d 589, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4408, 1993 WL 100339

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 6, 1993·No. No. 93-508·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, William Mendoza, appeals the summary denial of his Rule 3.850 motion for post conviction relief. We affirm.

Appellant filed a motion for post-conviction relief contending that his guilty plea was involuntarily entered. The trial court summarily denied the motion because the [590] grounds raised were either legally insufficient or refuted by the record. We agree that appellant’s claim is conclusively refuted by the record and plea colloquy attached to appellant’s motion. Agan v. State, 503 So.2d 1254 (Fla.1987). We affirm the denial of Mendoza’s motion for post-conviction relief.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, William Mendoza, appeals the summary denial of his Rule 3.850 motion for post conviction relief. We affirm.

Appellant filed a motion for post-conviction relief contending that his guilty plea was involuntarily entered. The trial court summarily denied the motion because the [590] grounds raised were either legally insufficient or refuted by the record. We agree that appellant’s claim is conclusively refuted by the record and plea colloquy attached to appellant’s motion. Agan v. State, 503 So.2d 1254 (Fla.1987). We affirm the denial of Mendoza’s motion for post-conviction relief.

Affirmed.

Mendoza v. State, 616 So. 2d 589, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4408, 1993 WL 100339 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

616 So. 2d 589 (Mendoza v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related