Mendoza v. Maury

550 So. 2d 1167, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5566, 1989 WL 118948
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 10, 1989·No. No. 89-03·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Kaney v. Kaney, 532 So.2d 1305 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988); Frank v. Freitag, 515 So.2d 335 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Somoza v. Solis, 511 So.2d 618 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. v. Kaminester, 400 So.2d 804 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mendoza v. Maury, 550 So. 2d 1167, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5566, 1989 WL 118948 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

550 So. 2d 1167 (Mendoza v. Maury) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Kaminester
400 So. 2d 804 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Somoza v. Solis
511 So. 2d 618 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Frank v. Freitag
515 So. 2d 335 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Kaney v. Kaney
532 So. 2d 1305 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)