Mendoza v. Maury

550 So. 2d 1167, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5566, 1989 WL 118948
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 10, 1989
DocketNo. 89-03
StatusPublished

This text of 550 So. 2d 1167 (Mendoza v. Maury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mendoza v. Maury, 550 So. 2d 1167, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5566, 1989 WL 118948 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Kaney v. Kaney, 532 So.2d 1305 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988); Frank v. Freitag, 515 So.2d 335 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Somoza v. Solis, 511 So.2d 618 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. v. Kaminester, 400 So.2d 804 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Kaminester
400 So. 2d 804 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Somoza v. Solis
511 So. 2d 618 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Frank v. Freitag
515 So. 2d 335 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Kaney v. Kaney
532 So. 2d 1305 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
550 So. 2d 1167, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5566, 1989 WL 118948, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mendoza-v-maury-fladistctapp-1989.