Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Mendoza v. City of New York

Mendoza v. City of New York

90 A.D.3d 453, 933 N.Y.2d 863
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 8, 2011
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 90 A.D.3d 453 (Mendoza v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mendoza v. City of New York, 90 A.D.3d 453, 933 N.Y.2d 863 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

[454]*454No triable issue of fact exists as to whether the detention, arrest, or prosecution was supported by probable cause, given that the police found plaintiff in a state of undress on premises identified in a valid search warrant as a drug distribution point, and a controlled substance was recovered from those premises (see Martinez v City of Schenectady, 97 NY2d 78, 85 [2001]; People v Mayo, 59 AD3d 250, 254-255 [2009], affd 13 NY3d 767 [2009]). Concur — Tom, J.P., Moskowitz, Richter and AbdusSalaam, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jackson v. City of New York
2020 NY Slip Op 3068 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Suero v. City of New York
2020 NY Slip Op 1301 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Luna v. City of New York
95 A.D.3d 413 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
90 A.D.3d 453, 933 N.Y.2d 863, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mendoza-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2011.