Mendoza v. City of New York
68 A.D.3d 482, 888 N.Y.2d 887
Opinion
The drastic sanction sought by plaintiff was properly denied for failure to show that defendants’ delays in meeting its disclosure obligations were willful and contumacious (see Mangual v New York City Tr. Auth., 48 AD3d 212 [2008]). Concur — Tom, J.P., Nardelli, Renwick and Freedman, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mendoza v. City of New York, 68 A.D.3d 482, 888 N.Y.2d 887 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).
68 A.D.3d 482 (Mendoza v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mangual v. New York City Transit Authority
48 A.D.3d 212 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)