Mendoza v. City of New York
68 A.D.3d 482, 888 N.Y.2d 887
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 8, 2009
StatusPublished
This text of 68 A.D.3d 482 (Mendoza v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Mendoza v. City of New York, 68 A.D.3d 482, 888 N.Y.2d 887 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).
Opinion
The drastic sanction sought by plaintiff was properly denied for failure to show that defendants’ delays in meeting its disclosure obligations were willful and contumacious (see Mangual v New York City Tr. Auth., 48 AD3d 212 [2008]). Concur — Tom, J.P., Nardelli, Renwick and Freedman, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Mangual v. New York City Transit Authority
48 A.D.3d 212 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
68 A.D.3d 482, 888 N.Y.2d 887, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mendoza-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2009.