Mendoza, Miguel Angel v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided September 26, 2012·No. 05-12-00513-CR·Published

Opinion

Order issue September 2/q, 2012 0042l.D

In The

MIGUEL ANGEL MENDOZA, Appellant

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. FOS-50983-M

ORDER On July 19,2012, this Court ordered appellant to file the brief within thirty days. We have

not received appellant's brief.

We ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant's brief has not

been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and recommendations and

determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether appellant is indigent, or if not

indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See TEx. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the

trial court cannot obtain appellant's presence at the hearing, the trial court shall conduct the hearing

in appellant's absence. See Meza v. State, 74 2 S. W .2d 708 (Tex. App.-Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.)

(per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be

necessary to assure effective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel. 00421:_ We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this

order.

This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The appeal

shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received,

whichever is earlier.

LANef:=+- JUSTICE

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mendoza, Miguel Angel v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Mendoza, Miguel Angel v. State (Mendoza, Miguel Angel v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.