Mendoza-Martinez v. MacKey

Supreme Court

Mendoza-Martinez v. MacKey

356 U.S. 258, 78 S. Ct. 713, 2 L. Ed. 2d 757, 1958 U.S. LEXIS 1266

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedApril 7, 1958

Docket54

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 356 U.S. 258 (Mendoza-Martinez v. MacKey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mendoza-Martinez v. MacKey, 356 U.S. 258, 78 S. Ct. 713, 2 L. Ed. 2d 757, 1958 U.S. LEXIS 1266 (1958).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of certiorari and the motion to substitute William P. Rogers, present Attorney General of the United States, as a party respondent in the place and stead of Herbert Brownell, Jr., resigned, are granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is vacated and the cause is remanded to the United States District Court for determination in light of Trop v. Dulles, ante, p. 86, decided March 31, 1958.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of certiorari and the motion to substitute William P. Rogers, present Attorney General of the United States, as a party respondent in the place and stead of Herbert Brownell, Jr., resigned, are granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is vacated and the cause is remanded to the United States District Court for determination in light of Trop v. Dulles, ante, p. 86, decided March 31, 1958.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

356 U.S. 258, 78 S. Ct. 713, 2 L. Ed. 2d 757, 1958 U.S. LEXIS 1266, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mendoza-martinez-v-mackey-scotus-1958.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack