Mendoza, Eric v. State
This text of Mendoza, Eric v. State (Mendoza, Eric v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NO. 07-99-0446-CR
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL B
JULY 27, 2000
______________________________
ERIC MENDOZA,
Appellant
V.
STATE OF TEXAS,
Appellee
_________________________________
FROM THE 251ST DISTRICT COURT OF RANDALL COUNTY;
NO. 9,043-C; HON. PATRICK PIRTLE, PRESIDING
_______________________________
ON APPELLANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
Before BOYD, C.J., and QUINN and JOHNSON, JJ.
On July 11, 2000, appellant, Eric Mendoza, filed a pro se “Petition to Dismiss.” The document, signed by appellant, requests that the appeal be voluntarily dismissed. Appellant is not represented by counsel.
No decision having been delivered prior to the receipt of the request for dismissal of the appeal, and all conditions applicable to the voluntary dismissal of a criminal appeal having been met, it is ordered that the appeal be dismissed pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2 (a).
Having dismissed the appeal at the personal request of appellant, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and this Court’s mandate shall issue forthwith.
Brian Quinn
Justice
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Mendoza, Eric v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mendoza-eric-v-state-texapp-2000.