Mendoza-Barragan v. Ashcroft
This text of 118 F. App'x 290 (Mendoza-Barragan v. Ashcroft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[291]*291MEMORANDUM
Gerardo Mendoza-Barragan petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“Board”) order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252.
Reviewing for abuse of discretion, Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003), we deny the petition for review, Ortiz v. INS, 179 F.3d 1148, 1153-54 (9th Cir.1999) (concluding that petitioners were not prejudiced by their counsel’s allegedly deficient performance because they failed to proffer evidence demonstrating eligibility for asylum).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
118 F. App'x 290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mendoza-barragan-v-ashcroft-ca9-2005.