Mendoza (Andres) v. State

Opinion

compliance with the procedural requirements set forth in NRS chapter 34. See Griffin v. State, 122 Nev. 737, 744, 137 P.3d 1165, 1169 (2006). Even assuming that appellant's use of the wrong vehicle could be overlooked, appellant's claim for additional presentence credit lacked merit because the time spent incarcerated after the sentencing hearing but before entry of the judgment of conviction is already credited as flat time against the sentence as the prison begins to calculate a sentence from the sentencing date. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

L°71 J. Hardesty

P e..4.0k

Parraguirre

J.

J.

cc: Hon. Abbi Silver, District Judge Andres Hernandez Mendoza Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

2

(0) I947A

- -• .7 - I,7-7• 7; 11