Mendolia v. TGI Friday's

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mendolia v. TGI Friday's

273 A.D.2d 286, 709 N.Y.S.2d 850, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6510

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 12, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 273 A.D.2d 286 (Mendolia v. TGI Friday's) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mendolia v. TGI Friday's, 273 A.D.2d 286, 709 N.Y.S.2d 850, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6510 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Berler, J.), entered July 6, 1999, as, after a nonjury trial, is in favor of the plaintiff Jane Mendolia and against it in the principal sum of $15,000 for past pain and suffering, and in favor of the plaintiff Elle D’Antonio Ullger and against it in the principal sum of $75,000 ($25,000 for past pain and suffering and $50,000 for future pain and suffering).

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof awarding the plaintiff Elle D’Antonio Ullger damages for future pain and suffering; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

We find no basis for the award of damages for future pain and suffering to the plaintiff Elle D’Antonio Ullger.

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Krausman and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Berler, J.), entered July 6, 1999, as, after a nonjury trial, is in favor of the plaintiff Jane Mendolia and against it in the principal sum of $15,000 for past pain and suffering, and in favor of the plaintiff Elle D’Antonio Ullger and against it in the principal sum of $75,000 ($25,000 for past pain and suffering and $50,000 for future pain and suffering).

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof awarding the plaintiff Elle D’Antonio Ullger damages for future pain and suffering; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

We find no basis for the award of damages for future pain and suffering to the plaintiff Elle D’Antonio Ullger.

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Krausman and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

273 A.D.2d 286, 709 N.Y.S.2d 850, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6510, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mendolia-v-tgi-fridays-nyappdiv-2000.