Mendolia v. Saad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mendolia v. Saad

214 A.D.2d 547, 625 N.Y.S.2d 914, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3528

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 3, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 214 A.D.2d 547 (Mendolia v. Saad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mendolia v. Saad, 214 A.D.2d 547, 625 N.Y.S.2d 914, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3528 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages, inter alia, for medical malpractice, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Milano, J.), dated February 2, 1994, which granted the defendants’ separate motions for partial summary judgment dismissing the claims that had accrued prior to April 10, 1982.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly concluded that any claims based upon the injured plaintiff’s ingestion of drugs that preceded the commencement of this action by more than three years were time-barred (see, CPLR 203 [a]; 214 [5]; Thornton v Roosevelt Hosp., 47 NY2d 780, see also; Snyder v Town Insulation, 81 NY2d 429). Bracken, J. P., Thompson, Hart and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages, inter alia, for medical malpractice, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Milano, J.), dated February 2, 1994, which granted the defendants’ separate motions for partial summary judgment dismissing the claims that had accrued prior to April 10, 1982.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly concluded that any claims based upon the injured plaintiff’s ingestion of drugs that preceded the commencement of this action by more than three years were time-barred (see, CPLR 203 [a]; 214 [5]; Thornton v Roosevelt Hosp., 47 NY2d 780, see also; Snyder v Town Insulation, 81 NY2d 429). Bracken, J. P., Thompson, Hart and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

214 A.D.2d 547, 625 N.Y.S.2d 914, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3528, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mendolia-v-saad-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack