Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Mendola v. Piehler Pontiac Corp.

Mendola v. Piehler Pontiac Corp.

51 A.D.2d 886, 380 N.Y.S.2d 1023, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11512
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 24, 1976
StatusPublished

This text of 51 A.D.2d 886 (Mendola v. Piehler Pontiac Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mendola v. Piehler Pontiac Corp., 51 A.D.2d 886, 380 N.Y.S.2d 1023, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11512 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and complaint dismissed with leave to plaintiff to serve an amended complaint, if so advised, within 20 days. (See Perkins v Merchants Mut. Ins. Co., 50 AD2d 1070; Oeschger v Fullforth, 51 AD2d —.) (Appeal from order of Monroe Supreme Court, in automobile negligence action.) Present—Moule, J. P., Cardamone, Simons, Dillon and Witmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Perkins v. Merchants Mutual Insurance
50 A.D.2d 1070 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
51 A.D.2d 886, 380 N.Y.S.2d 1023, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11512, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mendola-v-piehler-pontiac-corp-nyappdiv-1976.