Mendola v. Piehler Pontiac Corp.
51 A.D.2d 886, 380 N.Y.S.2d 1023, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11512
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 24, 1976·Published
Opinion
Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and complaint dismissed with leave to plaintiff to serve an amended complaint, if so advised, within 20 days. (See Perkins v Merchants Mut. Ins. Co., 50 AD2d 1070; Oeschger v Fullforth, 51 AD2d —.) (Appeal from order of Monroe Supreme Court, in automobile negligence action.) Present—Moule, J. P., Cardamone, Simons, Dillon and Witmer, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mendola v. Piehler Pontiac Corp., 51 A.D.2d 886, 380 N.Y.S.2d 1023, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11512 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).
51 A.D.2d 886 (Mendola v. Piehler Pontiac Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Perkins v. Merchants Mutual Insurance
50 A.D.2d 1070 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)