Mendioca v. Orr

16 Cal. 368
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1860
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 16 Cal. 368 (Mendioca v. Orr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mendioca v. Orr, 16 Cal. 368 (Cal. 1860).

Opinion

Cope, J. delivered the opinion of the Court

Baldwin, J. concurring.

In this case, an appeal from a Justice’s Court to the County Court of Santa Cruz county was dismissed, on the ground that the record did not show that the notice of appeal had been served upon the adverse party. The appellant offered to prove by affidavit that the service had in fact been made, but the Court declined to admit the proof. This was clearly erroneous. The fact of service was the important matter, and it was of no consequence that its existence was not shown by the record. If the service was made, the jurisdiction had attached; and to show that it was made, the affidavit of the appellant was competent and proper evidence.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mendini v. Milner
276 P. 35 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1929)
Farmers & Miners State Bank v. Probst
246 P. 249 (Montana Supreme Court, 1926)
Dalzell v. Superior Court of San Benito County
7 P. 910 (California Supreme Court, 1885)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 Cal. 368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mendioca-v-orr-cal-1860.