Mendicino v. Rendina

526 A.2d 1188, 515 Pa. 84, 1987 Pa. LEXIS 741
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJune 16, 1987
DocketPetition No. 343 W.D. Allocatur Dkt 1986
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 526 A.2d 1188 (Mendicino v. Rendina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mendicino v. Rendina, 526 A.2d 1188, 515 Pa. 84, 1987 Pa. LEXIS 741 (Pa. 1987).

Opinion

[85]*85ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 16th day of June, 1987, the petition for allowance of appeal is granted only with regard to the issue of damages. The order of the Superior Court is vacated to the extent that court found the damages issue to be waived, and the case is remanded to the Superior Court for consideration of the damages issue. In all other respects, the petition is denied.

Jurisdiction relinquished.

HUTCHINSON, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mendicino v. Rendina
566 A.2d 854 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
526 A.2d 1188, 515 Pa. 84, 1987 Pa. LEXIS 741, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mendicino-v-rendina-pa-1987.