Mendez v. Union Theological Seminary
This text of 8 A.D.3d 32 (Mendez v. Union Theological Seminary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Gerald Esposito, J.), entered December 5, 2002, which, insofar as appealed from, denied plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment as to liability on his cause of action under Labor Law § 240 (1), unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion granted and the matter remanded for further proceedings.
Plaintiff fell from a scaffold formed by metal “elbow” pipes that supported wooden planks. It is undisputed that the planks [33]*33were not tied or secured to the “elbow” pipes. Plaintiff testified that he fell when the plank on which he was standing “flipped over.” Since this testimony was not controverted by any competent evidence in the record, plaintiff established that his injuries had been proximately caused, in whole or in part, by a failure to provide him with a scaffold “so constructed . . . as to give proper protection” against elevation-related hazards (Labor Law § 240 [1]). Accordingly, plaintiff is entitled to judgment, as a matter of law, on the issue of liability. Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Lerner, Friedman and Gonzalez, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 A.D.3d 32, 777 N.Y.S.2d 636, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7573, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mendez-v-union-theological-seminary-nyappdiv-2004.