Mendez v. Dadeland Dodge, Inc.

657 So. 2d 1287, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 8247, 1995 WL 453998
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 2, 1995·No. No. 94-1996·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In an automobile accident case where the theory of liability was vicarious, the trial court denied a motion to amend the complaint to urge liability on a bailee in contrast to ownership of the dangerous instrumentality. The matter not having been set for trial, we reverse the order denying the amendment under the principles announced in Hart Properties, Inc. v. Slack, 159 So.2d 236 (Fla. 1963); O’Brien v. Young, 538 So.2d 112 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); Old Republic Insurance Co. v. Wilson, 449 So.2d 421 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); McClendon v. Key, 209 So.2d 273 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968), and return the matter to the trial court for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mendez v. Dadeland Dodge, Inc., 657 So. 2d 1287, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 8247, 1995 WL 453998 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

657 So. 2d 1287 (Mendez v. Dadeland Dodge, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

O'BRIEN v. Young
538 So. 2d 112 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Hart Properties, Inc. v. Slack
159 So. 2d 236 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1963)
McClendon v. Key
209 So. 2d 273 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)
Old Republic Ins. Co. v. Wilson
449 So. 2d 421 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)