Mendez v. Clark Equipment Co.

503 So. 2d 912, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 13689
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 28, 1987
DocketNo. 86-1250
StatusPublished

This text of 503 So. 2d 912 (Mendez v. Clark Equipment Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mendez v. Clark Equipment Co., 503 So. 2d 912, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 13689 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Pullum v. Cincinnati, Inc., 476 So.2d 657 (Fla.1985); Small v. Niagara Machine & Tool Works, 502 So.2d 943 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); Cassidy v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., 495 So.2d 801 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).

DANAHY, C.J., and SCHOONOVER and LEHAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Small v. Niagara MacH. & Tool Works
502 So. 2d 943 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Pullum v. Cincinnati, Inc.
476 So. 2d 657 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)
Cassidy v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.
495 So. 2d 801 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
503 So. 2d 912, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 13689, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mendez-v-clark-equipment-co-fladistctapp-1987.