Mendez v. Clark Equipment Co.
503 So. 2d 912, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 13689
Opinion
Affirmed. Pullum v. Cincinnati, Inc., 476 So.2d 657 (Fla.1985); Small v. Niagara Machine & Tool Works, 502 So.2d 943 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); Cassidy v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., 495 So.2d 801 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mendez v. Clark Equipment Co., 503 So. 2d 912, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 13689 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).
503 So. 2d 912 (Mendez v. Clark Equipment Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Small v. Niagara MacH. & Tool Works
502 So. 2d 943 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Pullum v. Cincinnati, Inc.
476 So. 2d 657 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)
Cassidy v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.
495 So. 2d 801 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)