Mendez v. Britt

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 22, 2010·No. 09-8104·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-8104

RAPHAEL MENDEZ,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

W. EARL BRITT, Federal Judge; JAMES B. CRAVEN, III, Federal Appointed Counsel; ALAN DUBOIS, Federal Appointed Attorney; JANE E. PEARCE, Federal Appointed Attorney,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:08-ct-03135-D)

Submitted: January 14, 2010 Decided: January 22, 2010

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Raphael Mendez, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Raphael Mendez seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to

Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,

403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in

forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal as frivolous. We also

deny the motion to “notice of error”. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mendez v. Britt, (4th Cir. 2010).

Mendez v. Britt (Mendez v. Britt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related