Mendez-Leon v. Gonzales
This text of 234 F. App'x 580 (Mendez-Leon v. Gonzales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Javier Mendez-Leon, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ final order of removal and, through his petition, he seeks review of a decision of the Legalization Appeals Unit (“LAU”) affirming the Immigration and Naturalization Services’ denial of his application for temporary resident status under a legalization program [581]*581established by the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, 8 U.S.C. § 1255a. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1255a(f). See Guzman-Andrade v. Gonzales, 407 F.3d 1073, 1076 (9th Cir.2005). We review for an abuse of discretion, see 8 U.S.C. § 1255a(f)(4)(B), and we deny the petition for review.
Mendez-Leon does not dispute that he has been convicted of three misdemeanors. The LAU did not, therefore, abuse its discretion in concluding that he is ineligible for the benefit of temporary resident status. See 8 C.F.R. § 245a.2(c)(1) (stating that an alien convicted of any felony or three or more misdemeanors is ineligible for temporary resident status).
Mendez-Leon’s contention that Congress intended to exclude illegal entry convictions in determining whether an alien is eligible for legalization is unpersuasive.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
234 F. App'x 580, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mendez-leon-v-gonzales-ca9-2007.