Mendes v. State
734 So. 2d 1168, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 7907, 1999 WL 393671
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 16, 1999·No. No. 99-1783·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
We affirm the summary denial of Appellant’s motion for postconviction relief as legally insufficient. The motion did not include all the information required by rule 3.850(c). However, our affirmance is without prejudice to Appellant’s refiling an amended motion that complies with the requirements of the rule. See Jones v. State, 708 So.2d 1045 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mendes v. State, 734 So. 2d 1168, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 7907, 1999 WL 393671 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).
734 So. 2d 1168 (Mendes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mendes v. State
770 So. 2d 202 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Leach-Wells v. City of Bradenton
734 So. 2d 1168 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)