Mendes v. State
734 So. 2d 1168, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 7907, 1999 WL 393671
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 16, 1999
DocketNo. 99-1783
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 734 So. 2d 1168 (Mendes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Mendes v. State, 734 So. 2d 1168, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 7907, 1999 WL 393671 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).
Opinion
We affirm the summary denial of Appellant’s motion for postconviction relief as legally insufficient. The motion did not include all the information required by rule 3.850(c). However, our affirmance is without prejudice to Appellant’s refiling an amended motion that complies with the requirements of the rule. See Jones v. State, 708 So.2d 1045 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Mendes v. State
770 So. 2d 202 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Leach-Wells v. City of Bradenton
734 So. 2d 1168 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
734 So. 2d 1168, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 7907, 1999 WL 393671, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mendes-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.