Mendes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Mendes v. State

507 So. 2d 180, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1305, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8285

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 20, 1987

DocketNo. 4-86-0762

StatusPublished

This text of 507 So. 2d 180 (Mendes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mendes v. State, 507 So. 2d 180, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1305, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8285 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. We have considered and reject the three (3) claims of reversible error asserted by appellant. Without deciding the issue, we find any claim of error as to the admission of a paramedic’s opinion as to the cause of the victim’s death to be harmless in view of the overwhelming evidence that the death was caused by the automobile accident in question. Cf. Pen[181]*181ton v. State, 114 So.2d 381 (Fla. 2d DCA 1959).

ANSTEAD, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. We have considered and reject the three (3) claims of reversible error asserted by appellant. Without deciding the issue, we find any claim of error as to the admission of a paramedic’s opinion as to the cause of the victim’s death to be harmless in view of the overwhelming evidence that the death was caused by the automobile accident in question. Cf. Pen[181]*181ton v. State, 114 So.2d 381 (Fla. 2d DCA 1959).

ANSTEAD, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

507 So. 2d 180, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1305, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mendes-v-state-fladistctapp-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack