Mendes v. State
507 So. 2d 180, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1305, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8285
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mendes v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 13 Fla. L. Weekly 826 →
Opinion
Affirmed. We have considered and reject the three (3) claims of reversible error asserted by appellant. Without deciding the issue, we find any claim of error as to the admission of a paramedic’s opinion as to the cause of the victim’s death to be harmless in view of the overwhelming evidence that the death was caused by the automobile accident in question. Cf. Pen[181]*181ton v. State, 114 So.2d 381 (Fla. 2d DCA 1959).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mendes v. State, 507 So. 2d 180, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1305, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8285 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).
507 So. 2d 180 (Mendes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Penton v. State
114 So. 2d 381 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1959)