Mendes v. Citizens Property Insurance Corporation
This text of Mendes v. Citizens Property Insurance Corporation (Mendes v. Citizens Property Insurance Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
RUBEN MENDES,
Appellant,
v.
CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION,
Appellee.
No. 2D2024-0128
January 22, 2025
Appeal from the County Court for Hillsborough County; J. Logan Murphy, Judge.
Pierre A. Louis and Alibia N. White of Louis Law Group, PLLC, Miami, for Appellant.
Maureen G. Pearcy of Paul R. Pearcy, P.A., Miami, for Appellee.
ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, Judge. Ruben Mendes appeals from an order entering final judgment in favor of Citizens Property Insurance Corporation. Mendes contends that the trial court erroneously treated Citizens' motion for summary disposition as a motion for summary judgment. Citizens confesses error on that point. We therefore reverse and remand for further proceedings without expressing "any opinion as to the extent of the error." Pederson v. Suntrust Mortg., Inc., 145 So. 3d 996, 997 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) (quoting Gulf Power Co. v. Ill.-Fla. Land Co., 132 So. 109, 110 (Fla. 1931)). Reversed and remanded.
NORTHCUTT and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.
Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Mendes v. Citizens Property Insurance Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mendes-v-citizens-property-insurance-corporation-fladistctapp-2025.