Mendelson v. United States
This text of 36 Cust. Ct. 491 (Mendelson v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The cases listed in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, involve valuation proceedings which arose by reason of judgments entered by this court in Felix M. Mendelson and Hoyt, Shepston & Sciaroni et al. v. United States, 31 Cust. Ct. 311, Abstract 57653; Thalson Co. and Joseph A. Paredes & Co. et al. v. United States, 33 Cust. Ct. 305, Abstract 58234; Felix M. Mendelson and Hoyt, Shepston & Sciaroni et al. v. United States, 34 Cust. Ct. 313, Abstract 58859; and Frazar & Hansen, Ltd., et al. v. United States, 35 Cust. Ct. 205, Abstract 59190. By those judgments, under the terms of the statute (28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d)), the matters were remanded to a single judge to “determine the proper dutiable value of the merchandise.” The proceedings have been abandoned by counsel for the plaintiffs. They are, therefore, dismissed.
Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
36 Cust. Ct. 491, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mendelson-v-united-states-cusc-1956.