Mendelson v. Auto-Magic Door Opener Corp.

48 A.D.2d 883, 369 N.Y.S.2d 203, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10137

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for breach of warranty and negligence, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered January 30, 1975, which granted plaintiffs motion to vacate paragraph 6 of appellant’s demand for a bill of particulars. Order reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements, and motion denied. In this personal injury action, one cause of action is based upon the alleged negligence of appellant. Accordingly, appellant is entitled to know, by way of a bill of particulars: "The acts and/or omissions alleged to constitute the negligence of [appellant.]” (Schnell v New York Tel. Co., 12 AD2d 523). Rabin, Acting P. J., Hopkins, Latham, Cohalan and Christ, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mendelson v. Auto-Magic Door Opener Corp., 48 A.D.2d 883, 369 N.Y.S.2d 203, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10137 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

48 A.D.2d 883 (Mendelson v. Auto-Magic Door Opener Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schnell v. New York Telephone Co.
12 A.D.2d 523 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1960)