Mendelson-Silverman, Inc. v. Malco Trading Corp.

238 A.D. 852
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1933·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Order of Appellate Term reversing judgment of the Municipal Court in favor of the defendant tenant, dismissing said defendant’s counterclaim and directing judgment for plaintiff unanimously affirmed, with costs. Under the terms of the lease there was no obligation upon the part of the landlord to hold the security money as a trust fund prior to six months of the expiration of the lease. That time has not arrived. When the parties to a lease by its express terms have excluded the security deposit from a trust relationship, and as to it have established between landlord and tenant the debtor and creditor relationship, the court may not interfere. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Carswell, Scudder and Davis, JJ. [146 Mise. 215.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mendelson-Silverman, Inc. v. Malco Trading Corp., 238 A.D. 852 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

238 A.D. 852 (Mendelson-Silverman, Inc. v. Malco Trading Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Donnelly v. Rosoff
164 Misc. 384 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1937)
Fields Holding Co. v. Chanbrook Realty Co.
246 A.D. 241 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1936)
In re the General Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors of Wolff Industrial Service, Inc.
245 A.D. 206 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1935)
Handle v. Real Estate-Land Title & Trust Co.
173 A. 313 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1934)
Malco Trading Corp. v. Mendelson-Silverman, Inc.
240 A.D. 322 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1934)
Rambach v. Heights Theatres, Inc.
239 A.D. 203 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1933)