Mendelsohn v. Weiss

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mendelsohn v. Weiss

221 A.D.2d 166, 633 N.Y.S.2d 143, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10703

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 2, 1995

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 221 A.D.2d 166 (Mendelsohn v. Weiss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mendelsohn v. Weiss, 221 A.D.2d 166, 633 N.Y.S.2d 143, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10703 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Lorraine Miller, J.), entered June 1, 1994, which denied defendants’ motion to extend their time to answer, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

[167]*167Defendants have utterly failed to offer a reasonable excuse for their failure to answer plaintiffs’ complaint. Defendants waited almost two months after its time to answer had expired and after there had been entry of a default judgment against them before they made their first appearance in this action. Prior thereto, defendant did not even mail the acknowledgment form back to plaintiff. Further, appellants failed to demonstrate merit to the defense of the action. Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Lorraine Miller, J.), entered June 1, 1994, which denied defendants’ motion to extend their time to answer, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

[167]*167Defendants have utterly failed to offer a reasonable excuse for their failure to answer plaintiffs’ complaint. Defendants waited almost two months after its time to answer had expired and after there had been entry of a default judgment against them before they made their first appearance in this action. Prior thereto, defendant did not even mail the acknowledgment form back to plaintiff. Further, appellants failed to demonstrate merit to the defense of the action. Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

221 A.D.2d 166, 633 N.Y.S.2d 143, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10703, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mendelsohn-v-weiss-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack